Octagonal Borders Taking Some Time To Resolve!

Picture of an octagonal border with two and a half large Milanese pinwheels in place. Somehow they look awkward.

I felt that the Octagonal borders needed to be less subdivided than the long borders, which in turn meant finding a large stitch pattern. After some to-ing and fro-ing, I decided that I like this one – Milanese Pinwheel (again from Jo Ippolito Christensen).

I’m not so keen on the fact that it doesn’t really tesselate neatly – there’s a peculiar shape left in the middle if you interlock the stitched in the obvious way, and it just didn’t look pleasing. So it was obvious to me that I had best space them out to create islands in an inner sea, as it were. Not like this, however – this was to be a set of five closely interlocked, leaving any partial pinwheels unstitched, to be replaced with some other stitch. But I think it’s already looking congested.

These Milanese Pinwheels (and partials) form a square. I'm not sure that's better!

So, trying again.

This time, four, spaced out to form a square. I’m really not convinced by this, either. The slanting sides of the octagons push the pinwheels too close together, so again we have a slightly congested look. Furthermore, as I observed with the borders for William Marshall, the square form can look very static, and in this case, that’s not playing nicely with the swirling movement in the pinwheels.

Four Milanese Pinwheels in a Diamond formation. This looks better, I think.

I think this does, however.

Upending the square onto the diagonal makes it possible to push the pinwheels further away from one another, and while it may only be a couple of threads, I think it looks less congested. That leaves room for me to put another, smaller, pattern “behind” the pinwheels, as it were.

You may notice that while I was wrestling in thought with those pinwheels, I kept on at the path.. So, now I have to do the pinwheels in the other octagon, and decide what to run into the background…

6 Comments

  1. The final octagon is definitely the best. You must have spent quite some time on trying out all the placements. Patient Rachel!

  2. Lin says:

    Once again trial, error and persistance pays off. xx

  3. Linda says:

    You picked the right one. Good luck with the background.

  4. Karen says:

    Amazing how much difference a small tweak makes, frustrating though it can be to start again after a rethink or two. The final option definitely looks more balanced.

  5. Alex Hall says:

    A lot of trial and error but a great outcome!

  6. Carolyn Foley says:

    You keep tempting me with your canvas work experiment. I keep seeing this big box of canvas at the Guild and everytime I pass it I think “maybe I can stitch some of those things Rachel does?” These experiments are so attractive.